Pogue

David Pogue Weighs In On Ebook DRM: Non-DRM'd Ebook Increased His ...
Mark Rosedale (an employee of O'Reilly) was the first of a few to send in David Pogue's recent column in which he discusses the question of ebook DRM. Remember, just recently a Sony exec claimed that you couldn't make money on ebooks ...
David Pogue on e-book DRM | TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home
Found via a TechDirt article on TechMeme, David Pogue's latest column weighs in on the issue of DRM on e-books. As expected from Pogue, who has been aware.
David Pogue Revisits DRM Question about Ebooks - Tools of Change ...
In a blog post today, New York Times Columnist (and bestselling O'Reilly author) David Pogue responds to a reader question about DRM (he calls it "copy protection") in light of all the recent ereader buzz, and he's very honest and open ...
David Pogue Weighs In On Ebook DRM: Non-DRM'd Ebook Increased His ...
Mark Rosedale (an employee of O'Reilly) was the first of a few to send in David...
Should E-Books Be Protected? - Pogue's Posts Blog - NYTimes.com
The issues involved with copy protection haven't changed. They're the same on e-books as they are with everything else.
Pogue: The Nook Is A Mess
"To use the technical term, it's slower than an anesthetized slug in winter."
Found Alive CO: Dariyen Pogue, 10 yrs old, Missing from Aurora 12 ...
Found Alive CO: Dariyen Pogue, 10 yrs old, Missing from Aurora 12/18/09 Missing/Located Forum Discussion.
David Pogue savages the Nook in the New York Times: “A mess ...
Savage” is the only word for it. Along with the Engadget review, this is the most negative review I've seen elsewhere of the Nook---jibing well with Jean.
David Pogue Weighs In On Ebook DRM: Non-DRM'd Ebook Increased His ...
David Pogue Weighs In On Ebook DRM: Non-DRM'd Ebook Increased His Sales - http://bit.ly/7XcWJb kudos to Pogue for trying #drm #ebooks.
Does any other area slam druggies like this?
Okay, so here's the deal, my friend and I's science fair project is due tomorrow in a county (parish) fair and to put it bluntly, we're dumb. We'd really appreciate it if you could smarten up our report, by using bigger words or adding sentences, maybe even changing the way we put things (in sentences) We'd REALLY love ysll forever <3 -Brandi and Hannah Introduction If put in a dangerous situation, witch do people rely on more, their common sense, or their sight? We became interested in this question after watching a popular video on YouTube of two hooligans pulling an invisible rope across a highway, and the automobiles stopping. After trying this on our own, we figured we'd do it legally for our science fair project. When we began this project, not only did we want to turn heads, but also make people think about it, do they truly let their thoughts get ahead of themselves? Procedure 1. Ask permission from the store owner if the venue can be used. 2. Set up a well organized table to record people's reactions to the experiment. 3. Have Helper A and Helper B sit at opposite sides of the shelves to where they are blocking the isle entrance. 4. Have Helper A and B pretend to pull a rope, and when the subjects get close enough, 'strain' the 'rope' tight as if trying to trip the them. 5. Record the subject's reactions, be sure to record as you go... adding to the table as needed. Discussion To reach our conclusion, we studied the results very carefully, and put much thought and consideration into it. We counted curiosity, politeness, and “see”ing the line all reasons rooted from thought since non of the subjects just walked straight through the 'string'; we considered this happening due to an allowance for their sight to sum the situation. We reasoned the way we did due to our patterned results; this was not in the least bit expected. If we were to do this project again, it is agreed that we would change up the experiment by simplifying the recordings as walking through the 'string' or not. This would definably help in determining the results in a simpler fashion. Conclusion It is concluded that 81% of the one hundred people tested rely more on their common sense more than they do on their sight. No big surprise here, I guess grandma's old sayin “I'd have to see it to believe it” doesn't apply to but only about 19% of people. Acknowledgments Springhill, Louisiana's Wal-mart Supercenter: for allowing us to perform our experiment in your isles. Pogue: for posting The Original Invisible Rope video on YouTube, and helping us in the process of finding a science fair project topic. Aaron Sherwood: For supporting us in both the legal and illegal trial and error project ideas.

Could you make this sound educated? (Science fair project report)?
My friend and I need research done on Perception vs. Reality for our project. Also, If anyone would like to read through the report and add suggestions or to get a since of what we're looking for that'd be great! THIS IS NOT FOR A GRADE, so we're not asking for you to do it for us. We're going to a county (parish) science fair, OH and any other links or ect. would help as well! Introduction If put in a dangerous situation, witch do people rely on more, their common sense, or their sight? We became interested in this question after watching a popular video on YouTube of two hooligans pulling an invisible rope across a highway, and the automobiles stopping. After trying this on our own, we figured we'd do it legally for our science fair project. When we began this project, not only did we want to turn heads, but also make people think about it, do they truly let their thoughts get ahead of themselves? Procedure 1. Ask permission from the store owner if the venue can be used. 2. Set up a well organized table to record people's reactions to the experiment. 3. Have Helper A and Helper B sit at opposite sides of the shelves to where they are blocking the isle entrance. 4. Have Helper A and B pretend to pull a rope, and when the subjects get close enough, 'strain' the 'rope' tight as if trying to trip the them. 5. Record the subject's reactions, be sure to record as you go... adding to the table as needed. Discussion To reach our conclusion, we studied the results very carefully, and put much thought and consideration into it. We counted curiosity, politeness, and “see”ing the line all reasons rooted from thought since non of the subjects just walked straight through the 'string'; we considered this happening due to an allowance for their sight to sum the situation. We reasoned the way we did due to our patterned results; this was not in the least bit expected. If we were to do this project again, it is agreed that we would change up the experiment by simplifying the recordings as walking through the 'string' or not. This would definably help in determining the results in a simpler fashion. Conclusion It is concluded that 81% of the one hundred people tested rely more on their common sense more than they do on their sight. No big surprise here, I guess grandma's old sayin “I'd have to see it to believe it” doesn't apply to but only about 19% of people. Acknowledgments Springhill, Louisiana's Wal-mart Supercenter: for allowing us to perform our experiment in your isles. Pogue: for posting The Original Invisible Rope video on YouTube, and helping us in the process of finding a science fair project topic. Aaron Sherwood: For supporting us in both the legal and illegal trial and error project ideas.

Perception Vs Reality SCIENCE FAIR help!?
tech fans of nytimes and health buffs of the oprah show... only difference is David Pogue is funnier.

David Pogue and Dr. Oz, do you notice they look similar somehow?


Which one do you think is funnier, David Pogue or the jokes on Vitamin Water labels?
Which technology writer to you think is funnier, or makes better jokes? David Pogue: http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/ Walt Mossberg: http://walt.allthingsd.com/ If possible, could you please include your opinion on who writes better? Thank you!

Who do you think is funnier, David Pogue or Walt Mossberg?


where can i download perfect stranger hathaway pogue has song?
I'm a 92 day reservist done with boot but I haven't been to MCT or SOI yet. Before I joined I really didn't know much about my MOS, Field Radio Operator, and I didn't realize how much of a pogue I would be. I'm not really the type for sitting around in a shop all day, I want to be out in the field, so I'm looking for any way to lat move to infantry, does anyone know if that's possible and have any advice for going about it? I talked to my career planner and he didn't have a definitive answer.

USMC- Can a 92 Day Reservist Lat Move?
http://i374.photobucket.com/albums/oo187/just-pogue/boon.jpg

Phishing What's the first thing that comes to mind when you see this?
I initially started thinking about serving in the Marines doing something related to finance and/or accounting. I'll be finishing up my AA degree in finance and want to have the opportunity to gain more experience in that field while serving. But at the same time, I don't care to be a pogue, and would like to do something more "exertive" with my time in the Marines...because lets face it, who goes into the USMC without wanting to go into combat? Is there a halfway point in the Marines? For example, would it be at all possible to spend my first two years of active duty working with artillery, then switch on over to desk work? Does having an AA degree really even mean anything? Will I be eligible for anything special with it? The recruiter I've been in contact with says that because of my AFQT score of 96, I can pretty much do whatever, but he never sounds too sure about what hes telling me. Also, do the Marines offer a way to continue working towards a BA degree while serving active duty? Had I chosen to join the Marines straight out of high school, this choice would be an easy one, but I don't care to pass up the opportunities for experiences that will help me pursue the career path I've been working towards. Thanks for any input

Dont wanna be a pogue, but dont wanna waste my degree...is there a halfway point in the Marines?
I'm trying to find a video I watched at some point in the last year that dealt with security when using a public wifi. I thought it was by David Pogue, but I could be wrong. The only specific scene I remember from the video is that the host goes into some sort of cafe (in NYC, I think) and starts browsing the web and checking email. The camera then cuts to a guy at another table running some software that allows him to see everything the host does over his unencrypted connection. The host goes on to talk about the risks of not using HTTPS, etc., etc. I know it's a long shot, but does this ring any bells for anyone?